The Korean Journal of Human Development

Article

A Validation Study on the Flow Experience Scale Measuring Personal Inclinations of South Korea's University Students

Author
Chang Inhee,Kim Leejin
Information
pp. 189~202 / 2016 Vol.23 No.3
e-ISSN2982-6845
p-ISSN1226-4474
Metrics Views 0 / Downloads 0
PDF

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to validate the South Korean flow experience scale measuring personalinclinations of university students that were developed by Ishimura in Japan. The participants were 269university students in Seoul and Chonbuk, South Korea. The collected data was analyzed by exploratoryfactor analyses, confirmatory factor analyses, and reliability analyses. The results are as follows. First, fivefactors(satisfaction, trance, improvement, control ability, unity) and twenty-seven items were extracted afterconducting an exploratory factor analysis on thirty-two items of five factors of the scale model developedby Ishimura. Second, the five factors model of exploratory factor analysis was more appropriate than theIshimura's five factors model of flow experience scale measuring personal inclinations after conductingconfirmatory factor analysis. Third, the result of flow tendencies in everyday life was that universitystudents experiened a normal level in general. For example, while South Korean university students hadhigh level of satisfaction and unity, they had few enjoyment of trance. The scale that developed in thisstudy is meaningful and appropriate to South Korean culture and the point of flow experience scale ofmeasuring personal inclinations. In the future, flow experience measuring personal inclinations of universitystudents will be used not only to understand the experience and psychological state of adolescence andadulthood but also to develop new programs about flow.

Keywords

university students flow experience scale measuring personal inclinations validation

References

  1. 박진용, 강명주 (2012). 온라인 플로우 측정의 개발과 타당성 분석. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 14(2), 1063-1078.
  2. 이미나, 최인수 (2008). 아동의 동기와 플로우가 창의성에 미치는 영향: 과학영역을 중심으로. 인간발달연구, 15(3), 45-61.
  3. 이병기 (2011). 구조방정식 모형에 의한 독서 플로우의 유형 분류와 검사도구 개발에 관한 연구. 한국도서관정보학회지, 42(1), 29-49.
  4. 이채호, 최인수 (2008). 아동용 인터넷 게임몰입척도 개발 및 타당화. 한국인간발달학회 학술대회자료집, 139-143.
  5. 이화선, 최인수 (2012). 플로우 관련 변인 간의 구조적 관계분석을 통한 학습플로우 경험의증진방안 모색, 교육심리연구, 26(4), 1053-1074.
  6. 신명희 (2004). 플로우 경험 측청 척도개발 및 타당성 검증. 경희대학교대학원 고황논집, 34, 173-189.
  7. 최인수 (2011). 창의성의 발견(창의성은 언제, 어디서, 무엇에 의해, 어떻게 발현되는가). 서울: 쌤앤파커스.
  8. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  9. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1992). A response to the Kimiecik & Stein and Jackson papers. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 4, 181-183.
  10. Jackson, S. A., & Eklund, R. C. (2002). Assessing flow in physical activity: The Flow State Scale-2 and Dispositional Flow Scale-2. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 24, 133-150.
  11. Jackson, S. A., & Marsh, H. W. (1996). Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: The Flow State Scale. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 18, 17-35.
  12. 張本文昭․川端雄人․小橋川久光 (2000). 陸上競 技選手のフロー経験について - Flow State Scaleを用いて - 東京電機大学理工学部紀要.
  13. 張本文昭․大村三香․平良勉․小橋川久光․川端雄人 (2000). 登山におけるフロー経験　野外教育研究, 4, 27-37.
  14. 石村郁夫 (2014). フロー体験の促進要因と肯定 的動機に関する心理学的研究,　風間書房.
  15. 小橋川久光 (2004). スポーツフロー尺度と運動のポジティブな心理的特性と関係. 第55回 本体育学会大会号, 220.
  16. 小橋川久光․金城文雄․平良勉․張本文昭․大村三香 (1998). 最適経験：運動学習時におけるフローの因子構造. 琉球大学教育学部紀要（第一部․第二部), 53, 219-226.
  17. Magnusson, D., & Sattin, H. (1998). Personal- context interaction theories. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & R. M. Lerner(Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology. Theoretical model of human development (Vol.1. pp. 685-759). New York: Wiley,
  18. Moneta, G. B. (2004). The flow model of intrinsic motivation in Chinese: Cultural and personal moderators. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5, 181-217.
  19. Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2002). The concept of flow. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology(pp. 89-105). New York: Oxford University Press,.
  20. 佐藤知行 (1984). 暴走族のエスノグラフィー　－ モードの叛乱と文化の呪縳－. 新曜社
  21. 佐藤知行 (1989). クライマーの動機とフロー経 験に関する研究. 筑波大学体育研究科修士 論文抄録, 11, 41-44.
  22. Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5-14.
  23. 谷木龍男 (2003). スポーツにおけるフローの質 的検討と尺度の作成. 筑波大学人間総合科学硏究科修士論文.